<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Two-Party System Is Essential Towards Establishing A Healthy Functioning Democracy And A People-Centric Government.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://limguaneng.com/index.php/2009/09/08/a-two-party-system-is-essential-towards-establishing-a-healthy-functioning-democracy-and-a-people-centric-government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://limguaneng.com/index.php/2009/09/08/a-two-party-system-is-essential-towards-establishing-a-healthy-functioning-democracy-and-a-people-centric-government/</link>
	<description>Competence Accountability Transparancy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cainnech</title>
		<link>http://limguaneng.com/index.php/2009/09/08/a-two-party-system-is-essential-towards-establishing-a-healthy-functioning-democracy-and-a-people-centric-government/comment-page-1/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>cainnech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://limguaneng.com/?p=586#comment-291</guid>
		<description>My comment is : -

A Two-party System is actually good or healthy for a country. Eg. Britain, Australia, USA do have such a system... But think that Malaysian have lack of understanding on &quot;What is mean by Two-Party System?&quot;...

If we are seriously understand the Western Two-Party system. They have &#039;Right-Wing&#039; or &#039;Left-Wing&#039; government.

1) Right = pro capitalism; means create a more pro biz environment for biz men and thus create job oppoturnities.
2) Left = pro trade union; means pro to the public or people for work force.

Look alike our understand on this issue only limited to &quot;to check and balances&quot;???

Take an example on our transport system.

&quot;Right&quot; government will set policies that pro to the biz environment. May be sometimss too much (pro); eg, we can say toll charges on highway. Means benefit go to toll company.

&quot;Left&quot; side government may adopt a different policy for the transportation system. There is to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of public transport system. Means benefit go to public. 

Have we even think about this (the above example)? Are we in the &quot;Right&quot; or &quot;Left&quot; ideology? 

Eg, have we even think on how to improve the public transport syetem in Klang Valley, JB or even George Town? I think mostly we are &quot;Right-Minded&quot; people as we cannot get a solution in this situation, right? Then an &#039;Unhealthy&#039; or &#039;No-Meaningful&#039; Two-Party System is just to &#039;check and balance&#039; the government?

If we consider the Western countries, their politics system just like &#039;driving a car&#039;... when u &#039;left&#039; turn too much (Eg, Cons Party)... then we want &#039;right&#039; turn now (Eg, Lab Party)... They have change their policies and ideology. How about us? Have we change much? If not, will the &#039;car&#039; drive to the shoulder -&gt; guard rail -&gt; accident (Either Left or Right turn)...

EXTRA INFORMATION...

(1) Enforcement in Law (Left) for the system or (2) build more highway (Right) may not solve the above problem. 

As (1) the public transport company may get a hugh loss ($$$) to run the biz; (2) the construction of highway is not as FAST as our newly register cars (length/long).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My comment is : -</p>
<p>A Two-party System is actually good or healthy for a country. Eg. Britain, Australia, USA do have such a system&#8230; But think that Malaysian have lack of understanding on &#8220;What is mean by Two-Party System?&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>If we are seriously understand the Western Two-Party system. They have &#8216;Right-Wing&#8217; or &#8216;Left-Wing&#8217; government.</p>
<p>1) Right = pro capitalism; means create a more pro biz environment for biz men and thus create job oppoturnities.<br />
2) Left = pro trade union; means pro to the public or people for work force.</p>
<p>Look alike our understand on this issue only limited to &#8220;to check and balances&#8221;???</p>
<p>Take an example on our transport system.</p>
<p>&#8220;Right&#8221; government will set policies that pro to the biz environment. May be sometimss too much (pro); eg, we can say toll charges on highway. Means benefit go to toll company.</p>
<p>&#8220;Left&#8221; side government may adopt a different policy for the transportation system. There is to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of public transport system. Means benefit go to public. </p>
<p>Have we even think about this (the above example)? Are we in the &#8220;Right&#8221; or &#8220;Left&#8221; ideology? </p>
<p>Eg, have we even think on how to improve the public transport syetem in Klang Valley, JB or even George Town? I think mostly we are &#8220;Right-Minded&#8221; people as we cannot get a solution in this situation, right? Then an &#8216;Unhealthy&#8217; or &#8216;No-Meaningful&#8217; Two-Party System is just to &#8216;check and balance&#8217; the government?</p>
<p>If we consider the Western countries, their politics system just like &#8216;driving a car&#8217;&#8230; when u &#8216;left&#8217; turn too much (Eg, Cons Party)&#8230; then we want &#8216;right&#8217; turn now (Eg, Lab Party)&#8230; They have change their policies and ideology. How about us? Have we change much? If not, will the &#8216;car&#8217; drive to the shoulder -&gt; guard rail -&gt; accident (Either Left or Right turn)&#8230;</p>
<p>EXTRA INFORMATION&#8230;</p>
<p>(1) Enforcement in Law (Left) for the system or (2) build more highway (Right) may not solve the above problem. </p>
<p>As (1) the public transport company may get a hugh loss ($$$) to run the biz; (2) the construction of highway is not as FAST as our newly register cars (length/long).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

